Integration of Chronic Care in a Fragmented Healthcare System Comment on “Integration or Fragmentation of Health Care? Examining Policies and Politics in a Belgian Case Study”

8Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The authors of “Integration or Fragmentation of Health Care? Examining Policies and Politics in a Belgian Case Study” present a fresh perspective on the inertia of integrated care (IC) implementation. They conclude that the decisive power in Belgium is fragmented and undermines efforts towards IC. As researchers in integrated heart failure (HF) care and active primary healthcare professionals, we comment on the three policy initiatives evaluated by Martens et al from a bottom-up perspective. A Learning Healthcare Network (LHCN) was established September 2019 to overcome fragmentation, the lack of evaluation and capacity loss each time a pilot project ends. This commentary wishes to illustrate that a LHCN can be a powerful meso-level mechanism to engage in alignment work and to overcome macro-level barriers that are often difficult to change and not supportive of IC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smeets, M., Baldewijns, K., Vaes, B., & Vandenhoudt, H. (2023). Integration of Chronic Care in a Fragmented Healthcare System Comment on “Integration or Fragmentation of Health Care? Examining Policies and Politics in a Belgian Case Study.” International Journal of Health Policy and Management. Kerman University of Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7143

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free