Intuitionistic logic according to Dijkstra's calculus of equational deduction

5Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Dijkstra and Scholten have proposed a formalization of classical predicate logic on a novel deductive system as an alternative to Hilbert's style of proof and Gentzen's deductive systems. In this context we call it CED (Calculus of Equational Deduction). This deductive method promotes logical equivalence over implication and shows that there are easy ways to prove predicate formulas without the introduction of hypotheses or metamathematical tools such as the deduction theorem. Moreover, syntactic considerations (in Dijkstra's words, "letting the symbols do the work") have led to the "calculational style," an impressive array of techniques for elegant proof constructions. In this paper, we formalize intuitionistic predicate logic according to CED with similar success. In this system (I-CED), we prove Leibniz's principle for intuitionistic logic and also prove that any (intuitionistic) valid formula of predicate logic can be proved in I-CED. © 2008 by University of Notre Dame.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bohórquez, J. A. V. (2008). Intuitionistic logic according to Dijkstra’s calculus of equational deduction. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 49(4), 361–384. https://doi.org/10.1215/00294527-2008-017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free