Motivation: Identification and interpretation of clinically actionable variants is a critical bottleneck. Searching for evidence in the literature is mandatory according to ASCO/AMP/CAP practice guidelines; however, it is both labor-intensive and error-prone. We developed a system to perform triage of publications relevant to support an evidence-based decision. The system is also able to prioritize variants. Our system searches within pre-annotated collections such as MEDLINE and PubMed Central. Results: We assess the search effectiveness of the system using three different experimental settings: Literature triage; variant prioritization and comparison of Variomes with LitVar. Almost two-thirds of the publications returned in the top-5 are relevant for clinical decision-support. Our approach enabled identifying 81.8% of clinically actionable variants in the top-3. Variomes retrieves on average +21.3% more articles than LitVar and returns the same number of results or more results than LitVar for 90% of the queries when tested on a set of 803 queries; thus, establishing a new baseline for searching the literature about variants.
CITATION STYLE
Pasche, E., Mottaz, A., Caucheteur, D., Gobeill, J., Michel, P. A., & Ruch, P. (2022). Variomes: A high recall search engine to support the curation of genomic variants. Bioinformatics, 38(9), 2595–2601. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac146
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.