Dynamics in partisanship during American Presidential Campaigns

6Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Despite their potential importance, little is known about the nature and prevalence of party identification dynamics within American presidential campaigns. This study reviews existing research to propose three basic contrasting models. It then introduces multivariate state space methods that account for sampling error and survey design effects to evaluate each model's relative support within daily national survey data of the 1984, 2000, 2004, and 2008 presidential campaigns. The results indicate that the balance of party identifiers had near-certain changes during three of the four campaigns, with campaign events often being associated with these changes. These findings suggest that polls and analyses that fail to allow for sudden shifts in party identifications will mask changes in public opinion. More generally, the findings demonstrate that campaigns shape party coalitions on Election Day, and possibly thereafter.

References Powered by Scopus

Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study

1733Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952-1996

778Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?

558Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Independent politics: How American disdain for parties leads to political inaction

220Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mobilization and political participation on Twitter. Case study of the hashtag #SuperTuesday in the primaries of the presidential elections of the United States 2016

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

DEMOCRACY AMID CRISES: Polarization, Pandemic, Protests, and Persuasion

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smidt, C. D. (2014). Dynamics in partisanship during American Presidential Campaigns. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(S1), 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu014

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

44%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

28%

Researcher 4

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 17

85%

Design 1

5%

Mathematics 1

5%

Psychology 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free