Objectives: Different static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) systems are available that are based on different design concepts. The objective was to assess seven different systems in a controlled environment. Materials and Methods: Each n = 20 implants were placed in identical mandible replicas (total n = 140). The systems utilized either drill-handles (group S and B), drill-body guidance (group Z and C), had the key attached to the drill (group D and V), or combined different design concepts (group N). The achieved final implant position was digitized utilizing cone-beam tomography and compared with the planned position. The angular deviation was defined as the primary outcome parameter. The means, standard deviation, and 95%-confidence intervals were analyzed statistically with 1-way ANOVA. A linear regression model was applied with the angle deviation as predictor and the sleeve height as response. Results: The overall angular deviation was 1.94 ± 1.51°, the 3D-deviation at the crest 0.54 ± 0.28 mm, and at the implant tip 0.67 ± 0.40 mm, respectively. Significant differences were found between the tested sCAIS systems. The angular deviation ranged between 0.88 ± 0.41° (S) and 3.97 ± 2.01° (C) (p
CITATION STYLE
Guentsch, A., Bjork, J., Saxe, R., Han, S., & Dentino, A. R. (2023). An in-vitro analysis of the accuracy of different guided surgery systems – They are not all the same. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 34(5), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14061
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.