An in-vitro analysis of the accuracy of different guided surgery systems – They are not all the same

9Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: Different static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) systems are available that are based on different design concepts. The objective was to assess seven different systems in a controlled environment. Materials and Methods: Each n = 20 implants were placed in identical mandible replicas (total n = 140). The systems utilized either drill-handles (group S and B), drill-body guidance (group Z and C), had the key attached to the drill (group D and V), or combined different design concepts (group N). The achieved final implant position was digitized utilizing cone-beam tomography and compared with the planned position. The angular deviation was defined as the primary outcome parameter. The means, standard deviation, and 95%-confidence intervals were analyzed statistically with 1-way ANOVA. A linear regression model was applied with the angle deviation as predictor and the sleeve height as response. Results: The overall angular deviation was 1.94 ± 1.51°, the 3D-deviation at the crest 0.54 ± 0.28 mm, and at the implant tip 0.67 ± 0.40 mm, respectively. Significant differences were found between the tested sCAIS systems. The angular deviation ranged between 0.88 ± 0.41° (S) and 3.97 ± 2.01° (C) (p

References Powered by Scopus

Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery

402Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

355Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Accuracy of implant placement with computer-guided surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cadaver, clinical, and in vitro studies

243Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Advancing accuracy in guided implant placement: A comprehensive meta-analysis: Meta-Analysis evaluation of the accuracy of available implant placement Methods

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Accuracy of implant placement via dynamic navigation and autonomous robotic computer-assisted implant surgery methods: A retrospective study

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An in vitro analysis of the accuracy of static and robot-assisted implant surgery

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guentsch, A., Bjork, J., Saxe, R., Han, S., & Dentino, A. R. (2023). An in-vitro analysis of the accuracy of different guided surgery systems – They are not all the same. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 34(5), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14061

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free