Allocating Resources for COVID-19 Recovery: A Comparison of Three Indicators of School Need

5Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

As students return to in-person instruction in the 2021–2022 school year, local education agencies (LEAs) must develop resource allocation strategies to support schools in need. Federal programs have provided resources to support restart and recovery. However, there is little consensus on how LEAs can target resources to support those schools most in need. This study investigates the relationship between three school need indicators (i.e., pre-COVID student performance and progress, school and community poverty, and pandemic vulnerability) and measures of student performance and progress throughout the pandemic to determine which indicators support valid school need inferences. We find that school poverty more strongly predicts performance and progress during the pandemic than pre-COVID academic measures. In elementary schools, we find that pandemic vulnerability independently predicts achievement even when conditioning on poverty and pre-pandemic achievement. Of the indicators of poverty we investigated, the percentage of free and reduced-price lunch-eligible students is the strongest predictor.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schweig, J. D., McEachin, A., Kuhfeld, M., Mariano, L., & Diliberti, M. (2022). Allocating Resources for COVID-19 Recovery: A Comparison of Three Indicators of School Need. Educational Assessment, 27(2), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2022.2087626

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free