THE HEART of the MATTER: INTERPRETING BLOODSUCKING ACCUSATIONS in MAURITANIA

7Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article examines events involving accusations of bloodsucking in the southwestern Sahara. French colonial archives allow researchers to identify specific cases in time and location; however, this article seeks to address but then move beyond histories of colonial governance. To highlight how communities in the Saharan desert dealt with crises provoked by environmental and social change, this investigation also relies on locally-produced written legal opinions and oral testimony. Emerging from these Saharan sources is one facet of how desert communities envisioned the enchantment of their social worlds and understood difficult periods caused by famine, weak economies, and domestic tensions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pettigrew, E. (2016, November 1). THE HEART of the MATTER: INTERPRETING BLOODSUCKING ACCUSATIONS in MAURITANIA. Journal of African History. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021853716000323

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free