The Long-Term and Geographically Constrained Effects of Campaign Advertising on Political Polarization and Sorting

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Scholars agree that there has been an increase in polarization among political elites, though there continues to be debate on the extent to which polarization exists among the mass public. Still, there is general agreement that the American public has become more sorted over the past two decades, a time during which political ad volumes have increased and ads have become more negative. In this research, we explore whether there is a link between the two. We take advantage of variation in the volume and tone of political advertising across media markets to examine the link between advertising and three dependent variables: issue polarization, affective polarization, and sorting. We focus on the impact of both recent ad exposure and cumulative ad exposure across several election cycles. Ultimately, we find little impact of advertising on polarization or sorting, both overall and among subgroups of the population.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ridout, T. N., Franklin Fowler, E., Franz, M. M., & Goldstein, K. (2018). The Long-Term and Geographically Constrained Effects of Campaign Advertising on Political Polarization and Sorting. American Politics Research, 46(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17721479

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

74%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

15%

Researcher 2

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 15

65%

Business, Management and Accounting 5

22%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

9%

Computer Science 1

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free