How optimal are the binding energetics of barnase and barstar?

71Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The extracellular ribonuclease barnase and its intracellular inhibitor barstar bind fast and with high affinity. Although extensive experimental and theoretical studies have been carried out on this system, it is unclear what the relative importance of different contributions to the high affinity is and whether binding can be improved through point mutations. In this work, we first applied Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatic calculations to 65 barnase-barstar complexes with mutations in both barnase and barstar. The continuum electrostatic calculations with a van der Waals surface dielectric boundary definition result in the electrostatic interaction free energy providing the dominant contribution favoring barnase-barstar binding. The results show that the computed electrostatic binding free energy can be improved through mutations at W44/barstar and E73/barnase. Furthermore, the determinants of binding affinity were quantified by applying COMparative BINding Energy (COMBINE) analysis to derive quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for the 65 complexes. The COMBINE QSAR model highlights ∼20 interfacial residue pairs as responsible for most of the differences in binding affinity between the mutant complexes, mainly due to electrostatic interactions. Based on the COMBINE model, together with Brownian dynamics simulations to compute diffusional association rate constants, several mutants were designed to have higher binding affinities than the wild-type proteins.

References Powered by Scopus

A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules

12097Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

WHAT IF: A molecular modeling and drug design program

3442Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces

1728Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Electrostatic Interactions in Protein Structure, Folding, Binding, and Condensation

678Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fundamental aspects of protein - Protein association kinetics

608Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modeling electrostatic effects in proteins

472Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, T., Tomic, S., Gabdoulline, R. R., & Wade, R. C. (2004). How optimal are the binding energetics of barnase and barstar? Biophysical Journal, 87(3), 1618–1630. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.040964

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

51%

Researcher 16

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28

49%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 12

21%

Chemistry 11

19%

Physics and Astronomy 6

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free