A mixture model-based strategy for selecting sets of genes in multiclass response microarray experiments

50Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Motivation: Multiclass response (MCR) experiments are those in which there are more than two classes to be compared. In these experiments, though the null hypothesis is simple, there are typically many patterns of gene expression changes across the different classes that led to complex alternatives. In this paper, we propose a new strategy for selecting genes in MCR that is based on a flexible mixture model for the marginal distribution of a modified F-statistic. Using this model, false positive and negative discovery rates can be estimated and combined to produce a rule for selecting a subset of genes. Moreover, the method proposed allows calculation of these rates for any predefined subset of genes. Results: We illustrate the performance our approach using simulated datasets and a real breast cancer microarray dataset. In this latter study, we investigate predefined subset of genes and point out interesting differences between three distinct biological pathways. © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response

10036Citations
3124Readers
Get full text

Statistical significance for genomewide studies

7712Citations
4800Readers
Get full text

A direct approach to false discovery rates

4239Citations
2422Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Broët, P., Lewin, A., Richardson, S., Dalmasso, C., & Magdelenat, H. (2004). A mixture model-based strategy for selecting sets of genes in multiclass response microarray experiments. Bioinformatics, 20(16), 2562–2571. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth285

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

35%

Researcher 9

35%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

31%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14

56%

Computer Science 4

16%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

16%

Engineering 3

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0