The Co-optation of Pro-Roma NGOs: Economic Interest, Buffering Effects and Roma Leaders

  • Maestri G
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter focusses on the way in which the participation of third sector organisations in the institutional governance of the Italian Roma camps has resulted in their co-optation, by reshaping their financial and social-organisational resources, and weakening and splintering the alliance between pro-Roma associations. It firstly illustrates the incorporation of civil society in welfare arrangements in Italy, focussing on the involvement of pro-Roma and Roma actors in the planning and implementation of the camps. The chapter then discusses three dynamics that led to their co-optation and, subsequently, to the persistence of segregation. First, the contracting out of camp services increased the economic dependency on public funding of certain non-governmental organisations (NGOs), who developed a managerial approach and toned down their claims for Roma inclusion. Secondly, the camp managers can deploy a degree of discretion concerning the interaction of the residents with the outside and the claims they are allowed to voice. Thirdly, the involvement of Roma leaders in the governance of the camps resulted in the silencing of the Roma communities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maestri, G. (2019). The Co-optation of Pro-Roma NGOs: Economic Interest, Buffering Effects and Roma Leaders. In Temporary Camps, Enduring Segregation (pp. 97–134). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03736-9_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free