Testing of coarsening mechanisms: Coarsening at random versus subgroup independence

6Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Since coarse(ned) data naturally induce set-valued estimators, analysts often assume coarsening at random (CAR) to force them to be single-valued. Using the PASS data as an example, we re-illustrate the impossibility to test CAR and contrast it to another type of uninformative coarsening called subgroup independence (SI). It turns out that SI is testable here.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Plass, J., Cattaneo, M. E. G. V., Schollmeyer, G., & Augustin, T. (2017). Testing of coarsening mechanisms: Coarsening at random versus subgroup independence. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 456, pp. 415–422). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42972-4_51

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free