I outline and consider the prospects for (and significance of) an account of causation in terms of dispositions. The basic idea is (roughly) that C causes E when C is the stimulus of some disposition of which E is the manifestation. Such an account suggests that causes are conditionally sufficient (rather than necessary) for their effects. I consider what semantics for subjunctive and counterfactual conditionals this requires, and examine the consequences for making a distinction between causes and mere conditions and between collective or complete causes and mere parts of causes. Finally, I review the significance of this account of causation for a metaphysics of powers (potencies, essentially dispositional properties). I argue that it would be a mistake to see a successful dispositional account of causation (whether this or another account) as vindicating an ontology of powers.
CITATION STYLE
Bird, A. (2020). A Dispositional Account of Causation, with Some Remarks on the Ontology of Dispositions. In Synthese Library (Vol. 417, pp. 151–170). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28722-1_10
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.