Geoid model validation and topographic bias

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recently a number of geoid campaigns were performed to verify different types of geoid and quasigeoid modeling techniques. Typically, GNSS-leveling was employed as an independent method, but in some cases zenith camera astronomic deflection data were also used in astrogeodetic determinations of the geoid and/or quasigeoid. However, due to the uncertainty in the topographic density distribution data (and thereby in orthometric heights), we conclude that neither GNSS-leveling nor astrogeodetic techniques can reliably verify differences between gravimetric geoid models at several centimeter levels in rough mountainous regions. This is because much the same topographic data are used both in the gravimetric geoid models and in their verifications by geometric and/or astrogeodetic geoid models. On the contrary, this is not a problem in verifying gravimetric quasigeoid models, as they are independent of the topographic density distribution, and so is the related normal height used in GNSS-leveling.

References Powered by Scopus

Physical geodesy

2353Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy

103Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modern determination of vertical deflections using digital zenith cameras

90Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Geoid or Quasi-Geoid? A Short Comparison

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Geometric Levelling Data and Some Systematic Faults in Their Treatment

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sjöberg, L. E. (2022). Geoid model validation and topographic bias. Journal of Geodetic Science, 12(1), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2022-0133

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 4

57%

Engineering 2

29%

Environmental Science 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free