Constitutional overperformance: an empirical study of de facto protection of rights with no de jure equivalents

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper we aim to contribute to the debate on successful enforcement of constitutional rules and its determinants by extending the focus to the phenomenon of constitutional overperformance, which arises when countries that do not include certain de jure rights in their constitutions, nevertheless de facto observe them. Firstly, we provide evidence that constitutional overperformance is a common phenomenon around the globe and it demonstrates high variation. Secondly, we identify factors which contribute to it. In particular, more constitutional overperformance is found in countries with older and less comprehensive constitutions, a high degree of democratization and a more robust civil society, plagued by less political conflict. Spatial interdependence effects are also identified confirming the diffusion of constitutional overperformance between countries. We base the conclusions on an empirical study conducted for a global sample of more than 100 countries.

References Powered by Scopus

2630Citations
1352Readers
Get full text
2423Citations
947Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Metelska-Szaniawska, K., & Lewczuk, A. (2022). Constitutional overperformance: an empirical study of de facto protection of rights with no de jure equivalents. European Journal of Law and Economics, 53(2), 289–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-022-09725-w

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

75%

Arts and Humanities 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free