[Comparison of a dental cone beam CT with a multi-detector row CT on effective doses and physical image quality].

2Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare a dental cone beam computed tomography (dental CBCT) and a multi-detector row CT (MDCT) using effective doses and physical image quality. A dental mode (D-mode) and an implant mode (I-mode) were employed for calculating effective doses. Field of view (FOV) size of the MDCT was 150 mm. Three types of images were obtained using 3 different reconstruction functions: FC1 (for abdomen images), FC30 (for internal ear and bone images) and FC81 (for high resolution images). Effective doses obtained with the D-mode and with the I-mode were about 20% and 50% of those obtained with the MDCT, respectively. Resolution properties obtained with the D-mode and I-mode were superior to that of the MDCT in a high frequency range. Noise properties of the D-mode and the I-mode were better than those with FC81. It was found that the dental CBCT has better potential as compared with MDCT in both dental and implant modes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yoshida, Y., Tokumori, K., Okamura, K., & Yoshiura, K. (2011). [Comparison of a dental cone beam CT with a multi-detector row CT on effective doses and physical image quality]. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi, 67(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.67.25

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free