Conventional ultrasound, color Doppler, TI-RADS, and shear wave elastography for thyroid nodule differentiation: a study of efficacy compared with the histopathology results

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Although a minority of the thyroid nodules is malignant, usually the invasive diagnostic procedures are warranted. This prospective study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of the US criteria in addition to the TI-RADS score and the SWE for the differentiation between the benign and malignant thyroid nodules as a potential surrogate for the invasive procedures. Results: Ninety-nine patients with thyroid nodules (79 females and 20 males, with a mean age of 45.9 ± 7.7 years; 30–69 years) were enrolled in this study and underwent conventional ultrasound, color Doppler, TI-RADS scoring, and shear wave elastography (SWE); the findings were correlated to the histopathological results. Our results revealed a significant increase in SWE elasticity indices (EIs) and presence of color Doppler signals in malignant nodules as compared with the benign ones (ρ < 0.05). Combined TI-RADS and SWE as well as TI-RADS and color Doppler imaging had given a better sensitivity for detection of malignancy. Conclusion: Elasticity indices had shown a significantly high diagnostic performance that is almost approaching the histopathological results. Combined SWE, color Doppler and TI-RADS, as a sum of findings, could effectively differentiate between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Furthermore, it had offered a non-invasive tool for accurate risk stratification of malignant nodules.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baz, A. A. A., Mohamed, A. H. I., El-Esawy, Y. F. G., & El-kaffas, K. H. (2021). Conventional ultrasound, color Doppler, TI-RADS, and shear wave elastography for thyroid nodule differentiation: a study of efficacy compared with the histopathology results. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-021-00474-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free