Common barriers to the use of patient-generated data across clinical settings

74Citations
Citations of this article
171Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Patient-generated data, such as data from wearable fitness trackers and smartphone apps, are viewed as a valuable information source towards personalised healthcare. However, studies in specific clinical settings have revealed diverse barriers to their effective use. In this paper, we address the following question: are there barriers prevalent across distinct workflows in clinical settings to using patient-generated data? We conducted a twopart investigation: a literature reviewof studies identifying such barriers; and interviews with clinical specialists across multiple roles, including emergency care, cardiology, mental health, and general practice. We identify common barriers in a six-stage workflow model of aligning patient and clinician objectives, judging data quality, evaluating data utility, rearranging data into a clinical format, interpreting data, and deciding on a plan or action. This workflow establishes common ground for HCI practitioners and researchers to explore solutions to improving the use of patient-generated data in clinical practices.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Supporting coping with Parkinson's disease through self-tracking

52Citations
124Readers
Get full text

Examining opportunities for goal-directed self-tracking to support chronic condition management

46Citations
85Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

West, P., Van Kleek, M., Giordano, R., Weal, M. J., & Shadbolt, N. (2018). Common barriers to the use of patient-generated data across clinical settings. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (Vol. 2018-April). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174058

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 93

76%

Researcher 15

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 63

64%

Design 14

14%

Social Sciences 11

11%

Engineering 11

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0