Chronic Wound Healing Models

31Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper, we review and analyze the commonly available wound healing models reported in the literature and discuss their advantages and issues, considering their relevance and translational potential to humans. Our analysis includes different in vitro and in silico as well as in vivo models and experimental techniques. We further explore the new technologies in the study of wound healing to provide an all encompassing review of the most efficient ways to proceed with wound healing experiments. We revealed that there is not one model of wound healing that is superior and can give translatable results to human research. Rather, there are many different models that have specific uses for studying certain processes or stages of wound healing. Our analysis suggests that when performing an experiment to assess stages of wound healing or different therapies to enhance healing, one must consider not only the species that will be used but also the type of model and how this can best replicate the physiology or pathophysiology in humans.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flynn, K., Mahmoud, N. N., Sharifi, S., Gould, L. J., & Mahmoudi, M. (2023). Chronic Wound Healing Models. ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science, 6(5), 783–801. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsptsci.3c00030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free