The reasons why the Public-Private Partnership contracts regime should be preferred to Government-to-Government (G2G) agreements in Peru

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The success attained in the development of the essential infrastructure for the XVIII Pan American Games and the Sixth Parapan American Games of Lima 2019 has demonstrated a distinct shift in the approach embraced by the Peruvian State in the execution of infrastructure ventures. The utilization of public-private partnership contracts has been relinquished in favor of government-to-government agreements. Is the idea or alternative of prioritizing Government-to-Government agreements as the initial option the most suitable or advantageous for the Peruvian State? In this article, we will assess the benefits and drawbacks of both approaches and propose criteria to evaluate which scheme would be the most favorable depending on the nature of the project or infrastructure to be undertaken.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stucchi, H. S. (2023). The reasons why the Public-Private Partnership contracts regime should be preferred to Government-to-Government (G2G) agreements in Peru. Ius et Veritas, 2023(66), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202301.007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free