Comparative analysis of different single cell metamaterial

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Artificially constructed metamaterial have become of considerable interest due to their negative properties. Under normal circumstance the electromagnetic energy inside metamaterial flows in the reverse direction. In this research, we compare seven different metamaterial structures against their negative frequency, simulation time, memory requirement and mesh cell. We also present a comparative analysis on tunability of single cell metamaterial structure to a different frequency band of interest. To come up with proper analysis we have restricted cell size of 2.5 mm 9 2.5 mm and simulated structure from 0 Hz to 20 GHz. SRR structure has a negative frequency response in a lower band while Jerusalem cross takes less simulation time. S structure has lowest memory and mesh cell requirement, but it is hard to tune. However, CLS loaded split ring resonator has advantages over all the parameters of comparison and is found best.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Katiyar, P. R., & Mahadi, W. N. L. B. W. (2015). Comparative analysis of different single cell metamaterial. In Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering (Vol. 315, pp. 289–298). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07674-4_29

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free