Factors affecting flow cytometric detection of apoptotic nuclei by DNA analysis

26Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Apoptotic thymocyte nuclei normally appear on a flow cytometric DNA histogram as a subdiploid peak. We observed that addition of a specific RNase A preparation to the detergent‐based lysing buffer increased the fluorescence of toxicant‐induced apoptotic nuclei to the level of untreated diploid unclei. The chelating agent EDTA partially inhibited the RNase effect, suggesting contaminating divalent cations may have been involved. Moreover, spectrofluorometric analysis revealed that addition of RNase or divalent cations decreased the amount of DNA present in the lysate. This suggested that the upscale fluorescence shift was due to a decrease in the ability of the lysing buffer to extract DNA, possibly as a result of cation‐induced chromatin condensation, rather than increased accessibility of fluorochrome binding sites due to apoptotic degeneration. Moreover, during a 16‐h culture, we observed a similar, but time‐dependent, upscale shift in the fluorescence of thymocytes undergoing apoptosis either spontaneously or as a result of exposure to 1 μM tributyltin methoxide (TBT), 2% ethanol, 2% methanol, or 1 μM dexamethasone phosphate (DEX). This commonality of effect suggests that a similar magnitude of chromatin reorganization occurs in apoptotic cells in prolonged culture regardless of the method of apoptotic induction. These findings should alert investigators to potential inaccuracies in the flow cytometric quantitation of apoptosis in in vitro systems employing prolonged toxicant exposures or complex lysing cocktails that may contain active contaminants. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.* Copyright © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elstein, K. H., Thomas, D. J., & Zucker, R. M. (1995). Factors affecting flow cytometric detection of apoptotic nuclei by DNA analysis. Cytometry, 21(2), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990210209

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free