Towards a Typology of Forest-Managing Organisations Around the Globe

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

HIGHLIGHTS The study of organisations in the forest sector is hampered by the lack of a coherent naming convention. Forest-managing organisations were classified according to their position within or at the intersection of the public, market, household, and social economy sector. Partnerships between types of forest-managing organisations frequently centre around public forest agencies. According to this typology, it was hypothesized that organisational characteristics determine the appropriateness of certain forest management systems. The proposed typology can serve as a starting point for better understanding the diversity of forest-managing organisations. SUMMARY The global diversity of forest-managing organisations (FMOs) could, so far, not be captured in a comprehensive framework or terminology leaving the research field fragmented. A typology of FMOs was developed using dimensions drawn from social economy theory to provide a unifying framework and coherent terminology. FMO types were described according to, (1) the formality of their land ownership and labour relations, (2) their objectives in managing forests, (3) their institutional characteristics, and (4) their participation in the social economy sector. The characteristics and forest management of each FMO type were reviewed. Additionally, public-private and private-sector partnerships between FMOs were classified. This multidimensional framework enables greater precision in the description and comparison of FMOs and their partnerships. Research hypotheses were elaborated to encourage future studies on how the characteristics of FMOs could affect the technical and silvicultural aspects of their forest management. .

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jenke, M., Hintz, K. S., Starfinger, M., & Giessen, L. (2023). Towards a Typology of Forest-Managing Organisations Around the Globe. International Forestry Review, 25(2), 190–210. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554823837244419

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free