Genetic relationships of hellbenders in the Ozark highlands of Missouri and conservation implications for the Ozark subspecies (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi)

20Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) is an obligately aquatic salamander that is in decline due to habitat loss and disease. Two subspecies of hellbender have been described based on morphological characteristics: C. a. alleganiensis (eastern subspecies) and C. a. bishopi (Ozark hellbender). Current conservation strategies include captive propagation for restorative releases even though information regarding the current levels of genetic variability and structure within populations is not sufficient to effectively plan for conservation of the genetic diversity of the species. To investigate patterns of population structure in the hellbender, we genotyped 276 hellbenders from eight Missouri River drainages, representing both subspecies. Our results showed low levels of within-drainage diversity but strong population structure among rivers, and three distinct genetic clusters. FST values ranged from 0.00 to 0.61 and averaged 0.40. Our results confirmed previous reports that C. a. bishopi and C. a. alleganiensis are genetically distinct, but also revealed an equidistant relationship between two groups within C. a. bishopi and all populations of C. a. alleganiensis. Current subspecies delineations do not accurately incorporate genetic structure, and for conservation purposes, these three groups should be considered evolutionarily significant units. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crowhurst, R. S., Faries, K. M., Collantes, J., Briggler, J. T., Koppelman, J. B., & Eggert, L. S. (2011). Genetic relationships of hellbenders in the Ozark highlands of Missouri and conservation implications for the Ozark subspecies (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi). Conservation Genetics, 12(3), 637–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-010-0170-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free