Survival analysis, more than meets the eye

18Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The log-rank test is a cornerstone of phase III oncology clinical trials. However, there are at least three different mathematical procedures that can be named the log-rank test and two of them are widely used by commercial statistical programs. Consequently, different P values can be obtained. In the case of a borderline statistical significance, this can mean the difference between the evidence (significant P value) and merely an observation. Since all three methods can be reported under the same name, space for possible data manipulation occurs. This should be of a particular concern in a drug regulatory context. Randomized clinical trials with borderline significant results should perhaps be required to report P values calculated by all three methods, in order to properly evaluate drug efficacy. An interactive MS Excel spreadsheet that uses all three logrank test variants is prepared as a supplementary file accompanying this article. Association of high grade of bone marrow fibrosis with poor outcome in patients with myelofibrosis is used as an example.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lucijanic, M., Skelin, M., & Lucijanic, T. (2017). Survival analysis, more than meets the eye. Biochemia Medica, 27(1), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free