ETHNIC CONFLICT AND THE INFORMATIONAL DIVIDEND OF DEMOCRACY

1Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Prevailing theories of democracy focus on class conflict. In contrast, we study democratic transition when ethnic tensions are more salient than the poor/rich divide, building a model where (i) ethnic groups negotiate about allocating the economic surplus and (ii) military and political mobilizations rest on the unobserved strength of ethnic attachment. Free and fair elections elicit information and restore inter-ethnic bargaining efficiency. Autocrats can rationally choose democratic transition, even if they risk losing power, as elections reduce the opposition’s informational rent. The predictions of our framework are consistent with novel country-level and ethnic group-level panel correlational evidence on democratization in the post-decolonization period.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Laurent-Lucchetti, J., Rohner, D., & Thoenig, M. (2024). ETHNIC CONFLICT AND THE INFORMATIONAL DIVIDEND OF DEMOCRACY. Journal of the European Economic Association, 22(1), 73–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvad031

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free