Dependable risk analysis for systems with E/E/PE components: Two case studies

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Accurate risk assessment of safety-related systems involving software is a hard engineering problem for well-known reasons. We present two case studies in the use of Ontological Hazard Analysis (OHA), a semi-formal method for hazard identification and analysis aiding Correct-by-Construction (CbC) approaches to developing such systems. OHA controls very carefully the means of expression of safety requirements, starting with a simple semi-formal language and proceeding to more expressive requirements through formal refinement, a decades-old technique for CbC program development developed in the computer-science theory community. In the case studies, the use of OHA allows the risk assessment of the systems through known techniques, avoiding the general problems posed by non-continuity which are inherent in attempting to assess the risk of systems based on software. © Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stuphorn, J., Sieker, B., & Ladkin, P. B. (2009). Dependable risk analysis for systems with E/E/PE components: Two case studies. In Safety-Critical Systems: Problems, Process and Practice - Proceedings of the 17th Safety-Critical Systems Symposium, SSS 2009 (pp. 95–115). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-349-5_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free