Current standard rules of combined anteversion prevent prosthetic impingement but ignore osseous contact in total hip arthroplasty

26Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: In this prospective study of 135 patients undergoing cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) we asked whether six current definitions of combined anteversion prevent impingement and increase postoperative patient individual impingement-free range-of-motion (ROM). Methods: Implant position was measured by an independent, external institute on 3D-CT performed six weeks post-operatively. Post-operative ROM was calculated using a CT-based algorithm detecting osseous and/or prosthetic impingement by virtual hip movement. Additionally, clinical ROM was evaluated pre-operatively and one-year post-operatively by a blinded observer. Results: Combined component position of cup and stem according to the definitions of Ranawat, Widmer, Dorr, Hisatome and Yoshimine inhibited prosthetic impingement in over 90 %, while combined osseous and prosthetic impingement still occurred in over 40 % of the cases. The recommendations by Jolles, Widmer, Dorr, Yoshimine and Hisatome enabled higher flexion (p ≤ 0.001) and internal rotation (p ≤ 0.006). Clinically, anteversion rules of Widmer and Yoshimine provided one-year post-operatively statistically but not clinically relevant higher internal rotation (p ≤0.034). Conclusion: Standard rules of combined anteversion detect prosthetic but fail to prevent combined osseous and prosthetic impingement in THA. Future models will have to account for the patient-individual anatomic situation to ensure impingement-free ROM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weber, M., Woerner, M., Craiovan, B., Voellner, F., Worlicek, M., Springorum, H. R., … Renkawitz, T. (2016). Current standard rules of combined anteversion prevent prosthetic impingement but ignore osseous contact in total hip arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics, 40(12), 2495–2504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3171-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free