Peripheral arterial disease: Scoping review of patient-centred outcomes

21Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) impairs patients’ quality of life (QOL), walking and ulcer healing, increasing patient pain, costs, and risks of amputation or mortality. A literature appraisal described PAD treatment capacity to improve validated patient-centred outcomes in controlled clinical studies. The PUBMED database was searched from 1 January 1970 to 21 June 2018, for original and derivative controlled clinical trial references addressing MeSH terms for ‘ischemia’ AND ‘leg ulcer’. Non-ischemic ulcer treatment references were excluded. Frequencies of improved (P

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53020Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II)

5054Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care

2387Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Association of wound genesis on varying aspects of health-related quality of life in patients with different types of chronic wounds: Results of a cross-sectional multicentre study

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Use of oral anticoagulation and diabetes do not inhibit the angiogenic potential of hypoxia preconditioned blood-derived secretomes

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Systematic review the efficacy and safety of cilostazol, pentoxifylline, beraprost in the treatment of intermittent claudication: A network meta-analysis

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bolton, L. (2019). Peripheral arterial disease: Scoping review of patient-centred outcomes. International Wound Journal, 16(6), 1521–1532. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13232

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

62%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

24%

Researcher 4

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 24

62%

Nursing and Health Professions 11

28%

Sports and Recreations 2

5%

Engineering 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free