Rebuilding a Damaged Heart

  • Müller-Ehmsen J
  • Peterson K
  • Kedes L
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background— The long-term effects of cardiac cell transplantation on cardiac function are unknown. Therefore, we tested the survival and functional impact of rat neonatal cardiac myocytes up to 6 months after transplantation into infarcted hearts. Methods and Results— Cardiomyocytes from male neonatal Fischer 344 rats (1 to 2 days, 3 to 5×10 6 ) or medium was injected into the infarcts of adult syngeneic female animals 1 week after left coronary artery ligation. Six months later, implanted cardiomyocytes were still present by quantitative TaqMan polymerase chain reaction and histology. In all treated hearts, discrete lumps of cells were present within the infarct scar, which was not observed in media-injected hearts typified by a transmural infarct scar. Infarct thickness was greater in treated animals versus control animals (909±97 versus 619±43 μm, P <0.02), whereas infarct size and left ventricular volumes were similar. By biplane angiography, left ventricular ejection fractions at 6 months were greater (0.36±0.03 versus 0.25±0.02, P <0.01) and significantly less infarct zone dyskinesis was seen (0.30±0.08 versus 0.55±0.07, P =0.035, lateral projection) in treated animals versus control animals. Conclusions— Grafted neonatal cardiomyocytes were present in infarcts 6 months after transplantation; they thickened the wall of the left ventricle and were associated with enhanced ejection fraction and reduced paradoxical systolic bulging of the infarct. Therefore, neonatal cardiac cell transplants exhibit long-term survival in a myocardial infarct model and contribute to long-term improved cardiac function. These results suggest that a damaged heart can be rebuilt.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Müller-Ehmsen, J., Peterson, K. L., Kedes, L., Whittaker, P., Dow, J. S., Long, T. I., … Kloner, R. A. (2002). Rebuilding a Damaged Heart. Circulation, 105(14), 1720–1726. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000013782.76324.92

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free