Proofs and Retributions, Or: Why Sarah Can’t Take Limits

7Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The small, the tiny, and the infinitesimal (to quote Paramedic) have been the object of both fascination and vilification for millenia. One of the most vitriolic reviews in mathematics was that written by Errett Bishop about Keisler’s book Elementary Calculus: an Infinitesimal Approach. In this skit we investigate both the argument itself, and some of its roots in Bishop George Berkeley’s criticism of Leibnizian and Newtonian Calculus. We also explore some of the consequences to students for whom the infinitesimal approach is congenial. The casual mathematical reader may be satisfied to read the text of the five act play, whereas the others may wish to delve into the 130 footnotes, some of which contain elucidation of the mathematics or comments on the history.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kanovei, V., Katz, K. U., Katz, M. G., & Schaps, M. (2015). Proofs and Retributions, Or: Why Sarah Can’t Take Limits. Foundations of Science, 20(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-013-9340-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free