The infusion method trial of void vs standard catheter removal in the outpatient setting: A prospective randomized trial

16Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE • To ascertain if filling the bladder with warm normal saline before trial of void (TOV) reduces time to decision of outcome of TOV and time to discharge compared with standard in-dwelling catheter (IDC) removal in the outpatient setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS • A prospective randomized controlled trial (not blinded) was carried out in the day procedure unit. Randomization was done using computer-generated random numbers. The sample size was calculated based on initial pilot data using α= 0.05 and β= 0.2 and a clinically important reduction of ≥60 min for time to decision of outcome of TOV (primary outcome measure). • In all, 60 consecutive patients were recruited from two referral sources: presentations of acute urinary retention to the emergency department and patients discharged home after failing TOV postoperatively. • The infusion method group (32 patients) had 300-500 mL warm normal saline infused into the bladder before removing their IDC and the control group (28) had standard IDC removal. • Data were collected and analysed using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS • The median time to decision was 135.0 (95% confidence interval CI 95.0-190.0) min in the infusion group and 247.5 (95% CI 189.6-294.1) min in the control group. • Patients undergoing a bladder infusion had a shorter discharge time [180.0 (95% CI 126.0-226.9) min] than patients in the standard-IDC-removal group [262.5 (95% CI 233.8-315.0) min]. • The infusion arm shortened time to decision by 112.5 min (P < 0.001) and time to discharge by 82.5 min (P < 0.001). • Furthermore, patients in the infusion group were 1.56 times more likely to achieve catheter-free state after TOV (risk ratio 1.56, 95% CI 1.03-2.36; P= 0.03). CONCLUSION • The infusion method for TOV is safe and expeditious, making it ideal for the outpatient setting. This randomized study shows that the infusion method enables a rapid determination of outcome of TOV with a greater chance of success and shortened discharge times. © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boccola, M. A., Sharma, A., Taylor, C., Wong, L. M., Travis, D., & Chan, S. (2011). The infusion method trial of void vs standard catheter removal in the outpatient setting: A prospective randomized trial. BJU International, 107(SUPPL. 3), 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10044.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free