Baby or bathwater? Referrals of “non-cases” in a targeted early identification intervention for psychosis

6Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the unintended impact of a targeted case identification (TCI) campaign for first episode psychosis (FEP) on people not experiencing FEP (“non-cases”) with respect to referral patterns and reasons for being a non-case. Methods: Sources of referral, reasons for being a non-case, and subsequent referral destinations of non-cases were examined before and after a TCI. Results: Following the TCI, a greater proportion of non-cases lived outside the study catchment area. A smaller proportion was referred by the parent hospital’s emergency room or had a substance-induced psychosis. Conclusions: TCIs for FEP may have unintended effects, with implications for early case identification and early intervention services.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jordan, G., Kinkaid, M., Iyer, S. N., Joober, R., Goldberg, K., Malla, A., & Shah, J. L. (2018). Baby or bathwater? Referrals of “non-cases” in a targeted early identification intervention for psychosis. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53(7), 757–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1502-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free