Neural Correlates of Cognitive Load While Playing an Emergency Simulation Game: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) provides reliable results for determining cognitive load based on averaged cortical blood flow during multiple repetitions of short cognitive tasks. At the same time, it remains unclear how to use this technique for assessing cognitive load during prolonged single-trial activity. In this study, we used a computer-based emergency simulation game for inducing different levels of cognitive load. We propose a novel approach to measure cognitive load using specific time slots, determined based on simulation log-data interpreted in light of Barrouillet's time-based resource-sharing model. To validate this approach, we compared cortical activity in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) regions measured at four specific time slots during a simulation. We found significant associations between cognitive load and neuronal activity within the DLPFC depending on the chosen time slot, whereas no such dependencies were found for the IFG. These results illustrate how knowledge of task structure could be used advantageously for the identification of cognitive load. Although requiring further investigation in terms of reliability and generalizability, the presented approach can be considered promising evidence that fNIRS might be suitable for more general reliable assessments of cognitive load during prolonged single-trial activities and for real-time adaptations in simulation-based learning environments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sevcenko, N., Schopp, B., Dresler, T., Ehlis, A. C., Ninaus, M., Moeller, K., & Gerjets, P. (2022). Neural Correlates of Cognitive Load While Playing an Emergency Simulation Game: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study. IEEE Transactions on Games, 14(4), 696–705. https://doi.org/10.1109/TG.2022.3142954

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free