An open comparative study of dispersible piroxicam versus soluble acetylsalicylic acid for the treatment of osteoarticular painful attack during sickle cell crisis

21Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We compared the efficacy and tolerability of oral piroxicam 1 mg/kg/day with soluble aspirin given at 100 mg/kg/day taken four-hourly in 58 patients with sickle cell anaemia and severe ostcoarticular painful attacks requiring hospitalization in a randomized, paralleled study. Main investigational criteria were pain relief, limitation of movement, fever, and insomnia or agitation. Both groups were well-matched at the commencement of therapy but most patients on piroxicam showed remarkable and significant pain relief and improvement in other parameters within 24 h. Unwanted effects were absent in the piroxicam-treated group whereas those treated with aspirin experienced nausea and vomiting. There were no significant changes in liver function tests with both forms of treatment. Oral piroxicam is an effective and safe treatment in the management of the osteoarticular painful crisis in sickle cell anaemia. It might prevent the use of parenteral analgesics and hospitalization and reduce the loss of school hours in patients who are being treated for bone pain crises that characterize sickle cell anaemia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eke, F. U., Obamyonyi, A., Eke, N. N., & Oyewo, E. A. (2000). An open comparative study of dispersible piroxicam versus soluble acetylsalicylic acid for the treatment of osteoarticular painful attack during sickle cell crisis. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 5(2), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3156.2000.00507.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free