Reproducing politics: the politicisation of patients' identities and assisted reproduction in Poland and Sweden

22Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article examines how discourses on assisted reproductive technologies are locally appropriated, translated or contested in the specific cultural and political contexts of Poland and Sweden. The aim is to investigate how two national patients' organisations, namely the Polish association Nasz Bocian and the Swedish organisation Barnlängtan, articulate rights claims in the context of reproductive technologies. To this end, we investigate how these organisations utilise specific context-dependent and affectively laden political vocabularies in order to mobilise politically, and discuss how each of these two groups gives rise to a different set of politicised reproductive identities. In order to trace which political vocabularies the respective organisations utilise to mobilise their respective rights claims, we draw primarily on political discourse theory and concepts of political grammars and empty signifiers. Lastly, we discuss which political reproductive identities emerge as a result of these different versions of political mobilisation around assisted reproductive technologies.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Anti-gender politics in the populist moment

158Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mobilizing Grassroots in the City: Lessons for Civil Society Research in Central and Eastern Europe

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

‘The purest citizens’ and ‘IVF children’. Reproductive citizenship in contemporary Poland

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gunnarsson Payne, J., & Korolczuk, E. (2016). Reproducing politics: the politicisation of patients’ identities and assisted reproduction in Poland and Sweden. Sociology of Health & Illness, 38(7), 1074–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12433

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

67%

Researcher 4

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 10

67%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

20%

Philosophy 1

7%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free