Cortical contributions to sensory gating in the ipsilateral somatosensory cortex during voluntary activity

26Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Key points: It has long been known that the somatosensory cortex gates sensory inputs from the contralateral side of the body. Here, we examined the contribution of the ipsilateral somatosensory cortex (iS1) to sensory gating during index finger voluntary activity. The amplitude of the P25/N33, but not other somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) components, was reduced during voluntary activity compared with rest. Interhemispheric inhibition between S1s and intracortical inhibition in the S1 modulated the amplitude of the P25/N33. Note that changes in interhemispheric inhibition between S1s correlated with changes in cortical circuits in the ipsilateral motor cortex. Our findings suggest that cortical circuits, probably from somatosensory and motor cortex, contribute to sensory gating in the iS1 during voluntary activity in humans. Abstract: An important principle in the organization of the somatosensory cortex is that it processes afferent information from the contralateral side of the body. The role of the ipsilateral somatosensory cortex (iS1) in sensory gating in humans remains largely unknown. Using electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings over the iS1 and electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve at the wrist, we examined somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs; P14/N20, N20/P25 and P25/N33 components) and paired-pulse SSEPs between S1s (interhemispheric inhibition) and within (intracortical inhibition) the iS1 at rest and during tonic index finger voluntary activity. We found that the amplitude of the P25/N33, but not other SSEP components, was reduced during voluntary activity compared with rest. Interhemispheric inhibition increased the amplitude of the P25/N33 and intracortical inhibition reduced the amplitude of the P25/N33, suggesting a cortical origin for this effect. The P25/N33 receives inputs from the motor cortex, so we also examined the contribution of distinct sets of cortical interneurons by testing the effect of ulnar nerve stimulation on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the ipsilateral motor cortex with the coil in the posterior–anterior (PA) and anterior–posterior (AP) orientation. Afferent input attenuated PA, but not AP, MEPs during voluntary activity compared with rest. Notably, changes in interhemispheric inhibition correlated with changes in PA MEPs. Our novel findings suggest that interhemispheric projections between S1s and intracortical circuits, probably from somatosensory and motor cortex, contribute to sensory gating in the iS1 during voluntary activity in humans.

References Powered by Scopus

Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses.

807Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intracortical connectivity of architectonic fields in the somatic sensory, motor and parietal cortex of monkeys

767Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Short latency inhibition of human hand motor cortex by somatosensory input from the hand

658Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Cortical and subcortical effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in humans with tetraplegia

86Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gating of sensory input at subcortical and cortical levels during grasping in humans

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Afferent input and sensory function after human spinal cord injury

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lei, Y., & Perez, M. A. (2017). Cortical contributions to sensory gating in the ipsilateral somatosensory cortex during voluntary activity. Journal of Physiology, 595(18), 6203–6217. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP274504

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 29

66%

Researcher 9

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 24

65%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

16%

Psychology 4

11%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free