Analysis of a prototypical multiscale method coupling atomistic and continuum mechanics

49Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In order to describe a solid which deforms smoothly in some region, but non smoothly in some other region, many multiscale methods have recently been proposed. They aim at coupling an atomistic model (discrete mechanics) with a macroscopic model (continuum mechanics). We provide here a theoretical ground for such a coupling in a one-dimensional setting. We briefly study the general case of a convex energy, and next concentrate on a specific example of a nonconvex energy, the Lennard-Jones case. In the latter situation, we prove that the discretization needs to account in an adequate way for the coexistence of a discrete model and a continuous one. Otherwise, spurious discretization effects may appear. We provide a numerical analysis of the approach. © EDP Sciences, SMAI 2005.

References Powered by Scopus

Quasicontinuum analysis of defects in solids

1376Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Basic error estimates for elliptic problems

1039Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Concurrent coupling of length scales: methodology and application

615Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

On the well-posedness of the linear peridynamic model and its convergence towards the Navier equation of linear elasticity

143Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Asymptotic expansions by Γ-convergence

90Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Atomistic-to-continuum coupling

86Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blanc, X., Le Bris, C., & Legoll, F. (2005). Analysis of a prototypical multiscale method coupling atomistic and continuum mechanics. Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 39(4), 797–826. https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an:2005035

Readers over time

‘10‘12‘15‘16‘18‘19‘2000.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

57%

Mathematics 2

29%

Physics and Astronomy 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0