Literature reviews are a main part of the research process. Literature Reviews can be stand-alone research projects, or they can be part of a larger research study. In both cases, literature reviews must follow specific guidelines so they can meet the rigorous requirements for being classified as a scientific contribution. More importantly, these reviews must be transparent so that they can be replicated or reproduced if desired. The rigorous requirements set out by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) aim to support researchers in conducting literature reviews as well as address the replication crisis that has challenged scientific disciplines over the past decade. The current chapter identifies some of the requirements along with highlighting different types of reviews and recommendations for conducting a rigorous review.
CITATION STYLE
Turner, J. R. (2023). Literature Reviews: An Overview of Systematic, Integrated, and Scoping Reviews. In The Quintessence of Basic and Clinical Research and Scientific Publishing (pp. 645–656). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1284-1_38
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.