Multi-species coexistence in Lotka-Volterra competitive systems with crowding effects

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
144Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Classical Lotka-Volterra (LV) competition equation has shown that coexistence of competitive species is only possible when intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition, i.e., the species inhibit their own growth more than the growth of the other species. Note that density effect is assumed to be linear in a classical LV equation. In contrast, in wild populations we can observed that mortality rate often increases when population density is very high, known as crowding effects. Under this perspective, the aggregation models of competitive species have been developed, adding the additional reduction in growth rates at high population densities. This study shows that the coexistence of a few species is promoted. However, an unsolved question is the coexistence of many competitive species often observed in natural communities. Here, we build an LV competition equation with a nonlinear crowding effect. Our results show that under a weak crowding effect, stable coexistence of many species becomes plausible, unlike the previous aggregation model. An analysis indicates that increased mortality rate under high density works as elevated intraspecific competition leading to the coexistence. This may be another mechanism for the coexistence of many competitive species leading high species diversity in nature.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gavina, M. K. A., Tahara, T., Tainaka, K. I., Ito, H., Morita, S., Ichinose, G., … Yoshimura, J. (2018). Multi-species coexistence in Lotka-Volterra competitive systems with crowding effects. Scientific Reports, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-19044-9

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 53

66%

Researcher 17

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40

56%

Environmental Science 16

23%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 9

13%

Physics and Astronomy 6

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free