N-of-1 Trials in Medical Contexts

  • Mitchell G
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Clinicians make treatment decisions on a regular basis, and some decisions may result in patients taking treatments for years. This decision-making is a core skill of clinicians, and if possible it should be evidence based. The most common tool to aid this decision making, the RCT, has many problems which can lead to a patient being prescribed a treatment that may not work for them. N-of-1 studies may be useful tools to assist in making the best decision possible. This chapter argues the case for N-of-1 studies assuming a place in the clinical armamentarium. It describes the rationale for and uses of N-of-1 trials, the advantages and limitations of N-of-1 trials, and discusses aggregation of N-of-1 trials to generate population estimates of effect. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mitchell, G. (2015). N-of-1 Trials in Medical Contexts. In The Essential Guide to N-of-1 Trials in Health (pp. 43–55). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7200-6_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free