Directed cycles in bayesian belief networks: Probabilistic semantics and consistency checking complexity

15Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although undirected cycles in directed graphs of Bayesian belief networks have been thoroughly studied, little attention has so far been given to a systematic analysis of directed (feedback) cycles. In this paper we propose a way of looking at those cycles; namely, we suggest that a feedback cycle represents a family of probabilistic distributions rather than a single distribution (as a regular Bayesian belief network does). A non-empty family of distributions can be explicitly represented by an ideal of conjunctions with interval estimates on the probabilities of its elements. This ideal can serve as a probabilistic model of an experts uncertain knowledge pattern; such models are studied in the theory of algebraic Bayesian networks. The family of probabilistic distributions may also be empty; in this case, the probabilistic assignment over cycle nodes is inconsistent. We propose a simple way of explicating the probabilistic relationships an isolated directed cycle contains, give an algorithm (based on linear programming) of its consistency checking, and establish a lower bound of the complexity of this checking. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tulupyev, A. L., & Nikolenko, S. I. (2005). Directed cycles in bayesian belief networks: Probabilistic semantics and consistency checking complexity. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3789 LNAI, pp. 214–223). https://doi.org/10.1007/11579427_22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free