This paper argues that the legacy potential of a firm's strategy is an important determinant of CEO compensation, turnover, and strategy change. A legacy makes CEO replacement expensive, because firm performance can only partially be attributed to a newly employed manager. Boards may therefore optimally allow an incumbent to be entrenched. Moreover, when a firm changes strategy it is optimal to change the CEO, because the incumbent has a vested interest in seeing the new strategy fail. Even though CEOs have no specific skills in our model, legacy issues can explain the empirical association between CEO and strategy change. © 2010 the American Finance Association.
CITATION STYLE
Casamatta, C., & Guembel, A. (2010). Managerial legacies, entrenchment, and strategic inertia. Journal of Finance, 65(6), 2403–2436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01619.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.