Using Watershed Boundaries to Map Adverse Health Outcomes: Examples From Nebraska, USA

10Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In 2009, a paper was published suggesting that watersheds provide a geospatial platform for establishing linkages between aquatic contaminants, the health of the environment, and human health. This article is a follow-up to that original article. From an environmental perspective, watersheds segregate landscapes into geospatial units that may be relevant to human health outcomes. From an epidemiologic perspective, the watershed concept places anthropogenic health data into a geospatial framework that has environmental relevance. Research discussed in this article includes information gathered from the literature, as well as recent data collected and analyzed by this research group. It is our contention that the use of watersheds to stratify geospatial information may be both environmentally and epidemiologically valuable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Corley, B., Bartelt-Hunt, S., Rogan, E., Coulter, D., Sparks, J., Baccaglini, L., … Kolok, A. S. (2018). Using Watershed Boundaries to Map Adverse Health Outcomes: Examples From Nebraska, USA. Environmental Health Insights, 12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178630217751906

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free