Clinical trial: Persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms despite standard therapy with proton pump inhibitors - A follow-up study of intraluminal-impedance guided therapy

80Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, is a common problem. Combined pH/impedance monitoring (pH/MII) enables detection of reflux episodes. Aim: To identify patients with objective episodes of persistent reflux and second, to evaluate the effect of modified therapy based on the results of pH/MII. Methods: In all, 143 patients were examined with pH/MII because of GERD-symptoms resistant to PPI-therapy. Patients with pathological pH/MII (group 1) and with normal results (group 2) were identified. Therapy modifications were evaluated after a minimum follow-up of 3 months. Results: In 56 of 143 (39.1%) patients, pathological findings in pH/MII were identified. Therapy was escalated in 33/52 patients (group 1) and in 30/71 patients (group 2). Escalating therapy led to symptomatic relief in 90.9% of the patients in group 1 and 43.3% of the patients in group 2 (P < 0.001). Conclusions: GERD symptoms refractory to PPI-therapy could be objectively identified with pH/MII in almost 40% of all patients. Furthermore, escalating anti-reflux therapy if pH/MII was pathological is associated with a significantly higher rate of successful treatment compared to the patients with normal findings. Therefore, pH/MII facilitates a more focussed therapeutical approach to patients with PPI-resistant GERD. © 2007 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Becker, V., Bajbouj, M., Waller, K., Schmid, R. M., & Meining, A. (2007). Clinical trial: Persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms despite standard therapy with proton pump inhibitors - A follow-up study of intraluminal-impedance guided therapy. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 26(10), 1355–1360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03529.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free