Algorithm for designing professional retraining programs based on a competency approach

34Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A new methodology is proposed for designing professional retraining programs for aviation, rocket, and space industry employees, focused on the formation of the necessary competencies. The novelty of the proposed method is in the formalization of the design process and the use of digital technologies. The advantage is the use of a modular principle of program design, which provides the opportunity to implement individual training paths for workers in industrial enterprises. The methodology was successfully tested at the Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University) in the provision of educational services to enterprises in the aviation and aerospace industries.

References Powered by Scopus

Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives

559Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reevaluating bloom’s taxonomy: What measurable verbs can and cannot say about student learning

94Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Competence in educational theory and practice: a critical discussion

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparative analysis of requirements for industrial cleanliness in mechanical engineering

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Curvilinear trajectory of track machines

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Special software application for antenna modelling in mechanical engineering

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anamova, R. R., Bykov, L. V., & Kozorez, D. A. (2020). Algorithm for designing professional retraining programs based on a competency approach. Education Sciences, 10(8), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080191

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 11

46%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Researcher 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 6

33%

Computer Science 4

22%

Social Sciences 4

22%

Arts and Humanities 4

22%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free