Comparison of etomidate and althesin in the reduction of increased intracranial pressure after head injury

34Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The increasing use of shorter-acting hypnotic agents to control intracranial pressure (ICP) following severe head injury has prompted a prospective double-blind controlled trial comparing the efficacy of etomidate and Althesin, given by i.v. infusion. Over the dose ranges used, the two drugs appeared equipotent in decreasing ICP whilst preserving cerebral perfusion pressure. However, in two patients (one in each group) ICP did not respond to hypnotic infusion, a feature noted in other studies to occur in a minority of patients. With the cessation of Althesin manufacture and the discussion about the use of etomidate infusions, it is timely to document the effectiveness of etomidate in decreasing ICP. © 1985 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dearden, N. M., & Mcdowall, D. G. (1985). Comparison of etomidate and althesin in the reduction of increased intracranial pressure after head injury. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 57(4), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/57.4.361

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free