Accidental versus operational oil spills from shipping in the baltic sea: Risk governance and management strategies

58Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Marine governance of oil transportation is complex. Due to difficulties in effectively monitoring procedures on vessels en voyage, incentives to save costs by not following established regulations on issues such as cleaning of tanks, crew size, and safe navigation may be substantial. The issue of problem structure is placed in focus, that is, to what degree the specific characteristics and complexity of intentional versus accidental oil spill risks affect institutional responses. It is shown that whereas the risk of accidental oil spills primarily has been met by technical requirements on the vessels in combination with Port State control, attempts have been made to curb intentional pollution by for example increased surveillance and smart governance mechanisms such as the No-Special- Fee system. It is suggested that environmental safety could be improved by increased use of smart governance mechanisms tightly adapted to key actors' incentives to alter behavior in preferable directions. © Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hassler, B. (2011). Accidental versus operational oil spills from shipping in the baltic sea: Risk governance and management strategies. Ambio, 40(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0128-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free