Oxygen production from air belongs to energy-intense processes and, as a result, possibili-ties for its decrease are a frequent topic of optimization studies, often performed with simulation software such as Aspen Plus or Aspen HYSYS. To obtain veritable results and sound solutions, a suitable calculation method hand in hand with justified assumptions and simplifications should form the base of any such studies. Thus, an analysis of the study by Hamayun et al., Energies 2020, 13, 6361, has been performed, and several weak spots of the study, including oversimplified assumptions, improper selection of a thermodynamic package for simulation and omission of certain technological aspects relevant for energy consumption optimization studies, were identified. For each of the weak spots, a recommendation based on good praxis and relevant scientific literature is provided, and general recommendations are formulated with the hope that this comment will aid all researchers utilizing Aspen Plus and Aspen HYSYS software in their work.
CITATION STYLE
Variny, M., Jediná, D., & Furda, P. (2021, October 2). Comment on hamayun et al. Evaluation of two-column air separation processes based on exergy analysis. energies 2020, 13, 6361. Energies. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206443
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.