Semantic-memory sources of episodic retrieval failure

Abstract

In a cued-recall paradigm, retrieval blocking was investigated as a source of episodic retrieval failure. Each unrelated-interference (UR-I) word pair (e.g., "nurse-dollar") had its own "competitive alternative" (e.g., "doctor'), which not only was strongly related to the cue word, but also possessed the same first two letters and final letter as did the target word. None of the unrelated-control (UR-C) word pairs (e.g., "clock-dollar") had such an alternative. Cued recall substantially increased from the cue-word-only (e.g., "nurse- ") to the three-letters-also cue condition (e.g., "nurse-do___r") for the UR-C but not for the UR-I word pairs. Instead, subjects frequently reported the competitive alternatives in place of the UR-I target words in the three-letters-also cue condition. It was suggested that, relying on the primary plausibility judgment, subjects falsely accepted the competitive alternatives while the UR-I target words were blocked from retrieval by the potent retrieval of these plausible alternatives. © 1985 Psychonomic Society, Inc.